Originally Posted by
pjthomas
Hydro forming really only applies to aluminum frames. Aluminum needs to be stiff to avoid fatigue stress so hydro forming allows stiffness to be added in the shape of the tubes. CrMo butted tubes are already about as light as necessary and does not need the same stiffness as aluminum, so hydro forming isn't going to do much, other than looks.
This bike is only a 1.5 lbs heavier than a Trek FX 3 disc (assume both are Medium) which has a hydro formed aluminum frame and a carbon fork. But the frame is CrMo and the tires are much wider.
One thing that is disappointing with both the Sequel and FX3 is they both still use square bottom brakets, which adds weight.
Oh, didn't realize it is a steel bike. My bad.
I wouldn't compare complete bike weights and then draw conclusions for comparing the frames.