Old 09-21-20, 02:47 PM
  #97  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times in 945 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Originally Posted by njkayaker
** I'm assuming you mean "sub 15lib bicycles".
No, I meant sub 15lb frames. lb being an abrv for pound. I have no idea what sub 15lib means.
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
I have no idea what sub 15lib means.
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
What's a liv?
Your attempt to discredit by fixating on what anyone else could easily understand is the insult in a reasonable discussion.
In the context of this discussion a reasonable person would know what I meant.


Keep digging!

Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Srsly.. did you really think I meant the current industry is pushing advanced technology towards recreational riders with sub 15lb frames? Or would a reasonable person assume I meant sub 15 lb bikes. Try not to play the darling innocent to hard.
You said you meant frame. You "clarified" what you meant by repeating the error. And then you repeatedly went on and on about a simple typo that was easy to understand!

You could have said you meant bicycle and avoided all this.


"Average recreational riders" aren't typically buying sub-15 pound bicycles either.

So, even with the non-correction correction, you still don't make sense.

Last edited by njkayaker; 09-21-20 at 03:16 PM.
njkayaker is offline