View Single Post
Old 09-10-19, 11:02 AM
  #106  
riverdrifter
Senior Member
 
riverdrifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 552

Bikes: 1985 Cannondale SR500, 1990 Cannondale ST600, 1993 Cannondale M700

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 108 Posts
Originally Posted by madpogue
How long are the cranks on the two bikes?

Can you slide the saddle back on the rails 5-10 mm?

Saddle-to-bar drop/rise is simply the difference in height (from the floor) between the saddle and the bar. Looking at your Jamis in your gallery, it looks like you have the stem at almost the same height as the saddle, but on the Trek, there appears to be more drop.

That said, looking at the two bikes overall, the sloping top tube can trick the eye, but still, the Jamis does appear to be a bit bigger frame.

Edit - yes, you got the saddle-to-bar thing right. Doesn't look like 2" difference from the photos, but the tame measure doesn't lie. Also, if you're comparing riding positions on the hoods, the brakes are lower on the bar on the Trek. At the risk of proposing blasphemy, if you're used to a more modern position on the hoods with the brake levers more "integrated" with the bar, a new-ish set of Tektro levers, and possibly a newer-style bar to match, might help with that positioning.
Both bikes have 170 mm cranks. I might be able to slide the saddle on the Trek back maybe another 2 mm, if that. It's back about as far as it can go.
riverdrifter is offline