View Single Post
Old 08-02-18, 12:21 PM
  #82  
prj71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2975 Post(s)
Liked 1,181 Times in 771 Posts
Originally Posted by tunavic
Better screen, better routing, rerouting when off course, maps built in, better support, easier to use, touch screen that's been tested and said to be almost as fast as using a smart phone, and a company that owns about 97% of the bike GPS market for only $50 more. Lastly, you can use a very inexpensive battery for longer run time. No contest.
I'm not a fan of touch screen for a cycling computer. Rather have buttons.

The screen I don't care about. As long as it displays Cadence, Speed, Distance and turning navigation that's good 'nuff.

I think you meant you can carry a spare power pak to recharge the battery for longer run time. That process doesn't work very well when participating in a 12 or 24 hour bike race event.
prj71 is offline