View Single Post
Old 06-05-19, 10:57 PM
  #25  
superdex
staring at the mountains
 
superdex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 4,311

Bikes: Fairdale Goodship, Spesh Crux

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
Don' just make things up.

Using the defaults at analyticcycling.com, a 165 lb bike+rider would coast down a
5% grade at 33 mph so a rider would have to brake to go 29 or 31 mph. That said, The rider would have to brake 105W to go down hill at 29 mph and 61W for 31. You could say that's an increase of 44W to go from 29 to 31. On the other hand for our rider to climb at 8 mph takes 280W and 394W for 11 mph. An increase of 114W. It looks to me like 44 is a lot less than 114.

You might also choose your work more carefully. This has nothing to do with efficiency. The word is speed. "When it comes to speed, it takes ... ."
GCN to the rescue?
#2 specifically
superdex is offline