Old 07-17-18, 08:57 AM
  #54  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by KraneXL
That wasn't a hijack it was an example. Albeit a lengthy one. In any event few threads can exist totally on their own. You can't talk about studies without first knowing who supported the study. After all, you would you believe a report that stated tobacco is safe that was funded by the tobacco industry would you? Another example, I'm not changing the topic to tobacco.

Lets suppose you read an article in Car and Driver about how magnificent the BMW 3 series is then discover that BMW is one of the magazine's major advertisers. How much credit do you now give to the review?
Now if its in Consumer Reports (no advertisers), or it says an independent study, then it will get my attention.

Now 'm not saying that the study is wrong (I love milk/dairy and will drink it regardless), only that its important to investigate and be an educated consumer.
so what's your problem with the national institute of health funding the study, or did you actually not read the study yourself?
redlude97 is offline