View Single Post
Old 10-02-23, 08:52 PM
  #9  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,484

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3195 Post(s)
Liked 1,729 Times in 1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
Brooks has been doing saddles for a very long time and they tend to fulfill the needs of many, many riders. When something has been perfected to the standards set by the company, and is continuously received by the consumer in a positive light at numbers that sustain the company, it says a whole lot about the product. It may be expensive, but it is very, very good.

Seems as though Gusti has a thing for goat leather. I think you ought try one for several thousand miles and report back with results.
A romanticized version of Brooks to be sure. “The company” was sold to Raleigh’s investment group in the 1960s, was sold and liquidated in the late ‘90s, and revived in ‘02, as noted upthread, by Selle Royal. Sure, today they do things mostly the old fashioned way, but I question how much of “the company” is still really in the place. Leather tanning and Cambium saddles are done in Italy, for example.

When I was a kid, there were all kinds of cheap, plastic Brooks saddles around, and certainly the elite sports segment was ruled by Italian brands. It’s only been fairly recently that Brooks was re-emergent as, the way I see it, a lifestyle brand. That’s not to say the saddles are uncomfortable, but it does raise questions about what kind of “special sauce” they may have, if any. Personally, I don’t give 2 bits to Brooks at any price, and would certainly never pay what they’re asking for those things. Brooks: better than wood, anyway.
chaadster is offline  
Likes For chaadster: