View Single Post
Old 10-16-17, 10:06 AM
  #24  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,584 Times in 1,432 Posts
The simplest way Basedown on your basic design, is to use freewheel hubs in both wheels. This has 2 benefits.

1- if both wheels freewheel, you have normal rim drive without engaging the pedal drive train.
2- you have a differential, of sorts since the outer wheel can overrun the inner on turns,

The drawback is that rolling backward is problematic.

The other option is a fluid or friction clutch in each wheel that allows some slippage under torque loads. This will solve the turning problem, but will probably slip a bit during acceleration.

The most perfect, though over engineered solution would be magnetic clutches for both wheels. These would be normally engaged, but either would automatically disengage then that brake is aplied. Of course, both would be disengaged for normal rim drive use.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline