View Single Post
Old 08-10-20, 03:36 PM
  #10  
billridesbikes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
Any algorithm would be complex. Choose property damage over causing serious injury to an individual.

Minor bumps and bruises for the person inside vs risk of serious injury or death to the pedestrian.
I’m fairly certain that algorithms will be optimized to prioritize driver and occupate safely including minor injuries, and if pedestrians get in the way that’s just too bad. (Thoughts and prayers)

There is no will now to protect cyclists and pedestrians if it inconveniences drivers even a little bit. Why would AVs change that mindset?

Given the current historical example, that automakers will give any thoughts at all to pedestrian or cyclists safety unless mandated by law is kind of a joke.

Last edited by billridesbikes; 08-10-20 at 03:37 PM. Reason: A word
billridesbikes is offline  
Likes For billridesbikes: