View Single Post
Old 06-26-18, 07:27 AM
  #8  
gettingold
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,018

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R 260 Disc; 2008 Trek 4.7 Madone; 2017 Framed Minnesota 3.0 Fat Bike; 1984 Nishiki International

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by datlas
I think the wide-angle lens view is that steel is durable, but heavier than other materials and can of course rust. Aluminum is lighter but has fatigue issues with LONG use. Carbon fiber is fine but if you crash or drop it, the material will break. Ti is lighter than steel, should not fatigue or rust, and if made properly should last a long time. Of course some metals can become brittle and if not made properly it can break.

So each material has something really good to offer and (of course) some drawbacks. Nothing is perfect.

That said, when I got my "forever" bike I did choose Ti.
I agree with all of this. I currently have Ti, carbon and steel bikes and have enjoyed them all. However, I ride the Ti every day and even when I plan to ride the carbon, I end up bringing the Ti instead, even on hilly rides.
gettingold is offline