Old 07-17-13, 08:03 AM
  #8  
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by alhedges
It may be a success, but I think most people will be paying for parking elsewhere. I kind of think the car share with only 5 cars isn't meant as a serious alternative - with 350 units, there will likely be 500-700 people living there, which is way too many people even if they only drive 2-4 times per month.
But they will probably use their cars much less if they walk a couple blocks to get them--especially if they walk past many shopping amenities and transit access on the way.

The on-premises share cars are brilliant, and I suppose more can be added as needed. Many carfree people use rental cars two to four times per year, not per month.

Besides, I think the point is that the inhabitants are committed to using cars much less or not at all. This building is designed to be convenient for people who are already carfree, or want to be.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline