View Single Post
Old 08-03-16, 02:41 PM
  #44  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,495

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7341 Post(s)
Liked 2,441 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet
The more I think about it, it must be the gauge. I can easily depress the tire with my thumb, and when I sit on the bike and look down I can see a generous amount of deformation at the rear contact patch.

I've also read that you should use a gauge that it's max capability is at about where you run the tires because the farther you get away from the gauges max, the readings become progressively less accurate. According to what I read it was significant too. Mine is an old 160 max. Doh!
Paging @FBinNY. He said something to the effect that measurement instruments are generally most accurate in their middle third of their capacity, which makes sense to me. If you aim to run 60 psi, you want a 120 psi-max gauge, in theory, because you want to read between 40 and 80 most accurately.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline