Old 05-16-19, 11:43 AM
  #10  
Moe Zhoost
Half way there
 
Moe Zhoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,957

Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times in 527 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
The common ground is they're both vehicles on the road that are expected to follow rules. If you want to make a more specific comparison, what's a rule that would have the same impact on both types of vehicles? I think that would be a very short list.

In my experience, drivers routinely run red lights (right after they turn red), take unsignaled right turns across lanes, pass in no passing zones, ignore pedestrians in crosswalks, back out of driveways into traffic without looking, fail to yield before taking a left turn in front of traffic, and pull into traffic lanes from parking spaces without signalling. All of these have vastly greater impact on other people's safety than just about anything a bike can do.

Also, so what if speeding is really just a factor for cars? It's a rule violation with very real safety implications.
Yes, you've hit the nail on the head. The degree of risk due to the infraction is the critical factor. And in almost all cases, the degree of risk is much greater for the cyclist than the motorist, regardless of who's in the wrong. Simply measuring incidence of infractions for cyclists vs. motorists is just not a useful statistic.
Moe Zhoost is offline