Originally Posted by
dz_nuzz
I think I am in the same boat of many people here, sure the money isn't really an issue, I can deal with it for a yearly license. But what are we really gonna accomplish? I mean so we test 3% of athletes instead of 1%? Is it really worth it? I don't think so. If someone is doping then let them run through the ranks, hit Nationals, win something and then get caught is my take.
Holloway (amateur national crit champion, multiple NCC crit winner) says he rarely gets tested - or at least he stated he "doesn't get tested enough" on Facebook a while back.
Point being there is no guarantee that moving up the ranks will get you tested.