Old 06-15-20, 09:43 AM
  #25  
Metieval
Senior Member
 
Metieval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857

Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times in 214 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
I have to disagree. They didn’t make mountain bikes in the 90s with frames shorter than 15” which are far too large. Small size mountain bike frames didn’t start to show up until the very late 90s/early 2000s.

If you want to share the experience...assuming about 6’ tall...go ride a 22” mountain bike and see how it fits.

because late 90's isn't the 90's .... who F'n knew?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!!

1996 Trek 850 Bicycle Type Mountain bike, non-suspension Weight 27.6 Sizes 14.5", 16.5", 18", 19.5", 21", 22.5" Colors Red, silver/blue Item ID 57250

It's bad enough you people are trying to rewrite history, and definitions, but what you do not get to do is claim 1996 isn't the 90's!!! LOL
Metieval is offline