Old 10-16-19, 07:44 AM
  #12  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
So far so good. And yes, it must be Less reactive than other Glue, Makes sense because it’s made to go on the underside of tires (Complete guess)
BTW the sock fix is fine IMO. A helmet made from a bag of styro peanuts would provide the same protection, as long as something held them in place and you had the same depth of material overall.

UV degradation is real, but its extent is *far* less than people imagine. Prolonged exposure - that would be leaving the helmet out in the sun every day, with the plastic cover missing - will result in yellowing and a covering of dust from the degraded Styrofoam. The thickness of that layer of dust compared to the thickness of the helmet represents the (trivial) reduction of impact protection. My opinion: there is nothing wrong with repairing a damaged bike helmet.
wphamilton is offline  
Likes For wphamilton: