View Single Post
Old 07-17-19, 02:07 PM
  #46  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,269
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1979 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Banzai
Percentages.

You don't feel the 16t as an absolute. You feel it as a percentage of ratio changed.

The percentage jumps are getting ridiculous.
One of the purposes of using a smaller double is to do less front shifting, though. It basically becomes a 1x-plus-bailout.

Without using smaller rings, it's hard to get super-low bottom gears or a low big-ring bottom gear unless you use a very wide-range cassette, and frequent wide rear-shift jumps can be more annoying than an occasional front shift being a few percent bigger.

A triple fixes both problems, but they're losing support.
HTupolev is offline  
Likes For HTupolev: