View Single Post
Old 01-06-17, 11:33 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Da Reef View Post
Yep, over by 3", 65" vs 62". Given the odd size of the bag I tried to explain that measuring from the longest/tallest/widest point to point wasn't really fair. She wasn't having it.'s definitely over the limit when properly measured.

they like to sell the unusual dimensions as a positive -- that it is easy to mis-measure (and therefore under-measure).

technically the agent was right. IME, it is rare to even get questioned about it, much less measured. if it happens 5% of the time, you still come out ahead.

it just LOOKS so much smaller than any other bike bag. that makes it easy for people to believe it's not a bike.
tetonrider is offline