Old 11-26-20, 12:22 PM
  #28  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,448

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3148 Post(s)
Liked 1,714 Times in 1,034 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
- I said old mtb drop bar conversions aren't good for someone who wants a talk stack and short reach bike.

- You quoted my full post and said my perspective is totally wrong. You then rambled that I am talking about aesthetics and that fit and geometry are not synonymous.

- I reiterate that old mtbs with drop bars are not the ideal setup for someone who wants tall stack and short reach.

- You as if I misquoted you.




Good lord. I was taking a chance replying to a chaadster post and I regret it once again.
yeah, like I thought, you don’t understand. As I said upthread, I wasn’t talking about vintage MTBs at all, rather your conflation of fit and geometry. I agree with you a vintage MTB is not a great starting point for the OP, ot only because of the geometry tending to be long and low, but because they can get a better bike looking at new stuff. Anyway, hopefully at some point, some of this will sink in for you.
chaadster is offline