View Single Post
Old 08-01-19, 06:04 AM
  #10  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Gresp15C
But I would certainly not conclude from these results that bikes are safer than floors.
...
I'm not a statistician, and I'm not sure it's possible to tease any useful information about the actual safety of cycling from this report. Granted the information is potentially useful for public health planning.
I agree with you. It's a subtle thing, but the report isn't looking at the safety of individual activities from the point of view of the participants. I know for example that I spend way more time on my floor than on my bike, so my floor is probably safer on a per hour basis.

Ok. Here's a question: If one were a public health official and wanting to reduce the quantity of head injuries, would it be sensible to choose the segment from this report having the largest quantity and to attack that segment first? Would it make sense to look at household injuries from flooring and furniture and so forth, and how to prevent those?
JonathanGennick is offline  
Likes For JonathanGennick: