View Single Post
Old 05-01-20, 07:15 AM
  #10  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by burnthesheep
Cool.

What about the part though where I said a minuscule detail involving your aero is significantly more important than a watt in the wheel hubs?

Is the concern that they don't spin nice in a work stand, don't roll as far down a small roll down test, or are they sooooooo slow descending that they outweigh the importance of your position on the bike?

I'm a marginal gains kind of thinker for TT, but there has to be some practical application as well.

Also, the whole spin down and little tests done aren't the practical application anyway. You'd need to be able to accurately replicate it at the speeds of concern like a rolling resistance test using a set of rollers and really nice power meter.

Unloaded bearing spin is a worthless assertion of their capabilities under load and at speed.
I failed to mention, I'm not an aero person and never have been, I'm just the wrong shape and wear shorts and a t-shirt to everything but races. So while I know position and clothing make a huge difference the ability of the wheel to spin significantly faster and stay stable at high speeds is very important.
Your last part I addressed with my example, couldn't agree more, wheel spin loaded is the important determiner.
Russ Roth is offline  
Likes For Russ Roth: