Old 10-23-19, 03:39 PM
  #12  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times in 1,435 Posts
I agree with @grolby. The Cross Check may not be sufficiently different. In particular, it's pretty darned heavy for a cyclocross frame. I had two Cross Checks. I built the first one with very lightweight wheels, so it rode pretty well, and the heavy frame plus the light wheels made it feel moderately light. The second build was too damned heavy, so I got rid of that one, too. But weight may not matter as much to you as it does to me. You may want to look at vintage frames, because you get a good value, and they tend to be lighter. My current main bike is a 1974 Raleigh International with all Reynolds 531 tubing. I weighed it and the Cross Check. The Raleigh fork weighs (barely more than) HALF as much as the Surly fork! The Raleigh was originally spaced at 120 mm in the rear, so I spread it to 130 mm. Of course, it doesn't take cantilever brakes, and I put dual-pivot brakes on it. I couldn't be more satisfied with the braking unless I had disc brakes.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline