View Single Post
Old 11-06-17, 12:54 PM
  #22  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by kings run east
Why? The research on nutrition, much less cancer causation, is far from conclusive. I'm just suggesting there is a large body of work that suggests that the opinion stated above isn't necessarily Monsanto propaganda.

"Testing," as you refer to it, is one form of knowledge but far from the only one.

Testing isn't a form of knowledge. Testing refers to an experiment.

An experiment is a procedure carried out to support, refute, or validate a hypothesis. Experiments provide insight into cause-and-effect by demonstrating what outcome occurs when a particular factor is manipulated. Experiments vary greatly in goal and scale, but always rely on repeatable procedure and logical analysis of the results.

I'm not saying you or your wife are wrong. I'm just asking you to prove it...or at least offer some sort of evidence to support your assertion.

On a related note, my friend said that if you step on a crack you break your mother's back. I haven't stepped on a crack since I heard that...and my mom didn't die of a broken back.
carleton is offline