Old 06-06-19, 07:31 AM
  #13  
mr_bill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypno Toad
I'm clearly about safer drivers and safer cars making people using bikes safer.

However, I'm sorry to sound like an a$$, but unless you've spent the time in school and industry you really shouldn't express your opinions on impact test methodologies. The angle on the test in the video represents the fact that a person on a bike sits much higher than the hood of a car. In a crash, the head will come down at an angle. This video with a test dummy helps illustrate the angle of impact of a cyclists head on a car during an impact.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7Oud3iGXWY

The system used in the Volvo/POC video is a modification of the EU pedestrian impact test system, this graphic also helps clarify the angle of this impact test.


source - https://etsc.eu/pedestrian-protection/
It's not just the EU. Japan too.

BTW, before the EU and Japanese pedestrian crash tests, often just below the "sproingy sheet metal" were hard immovable objects. Now, some hoods are pedestrian helmets.

Finally, Volvo Moose test:


-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Likes For mr_bill: