Old 08-06-20, 10:44 AM
  #6790  
fishboat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852

Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times in 471 Posts
Originally Posted by Korina
Probably geometry. Old mtbs have stupid long top tubes, add drop bars on top of that, and you're riding face down, folded in half. Mine has a short stem and swept bar to compensate.
+1
I recently did a drop bar conversion** on a Trek 970(I need to post some pics here..turned out GREAT..did a 130 mile short tour with it fully loaded and it handled beautifully)..I noted while researching models that the early '90s (1990-1993) 970's had about a 1.5 to 2cm shorter top tube than the mid to late 90s 970's (and presumably the 950's, 990's). Big difference when adding drop bars. I went with Ritchey ErgoMax drop bars..they have a 10mm rise and 4 degree sweep back..both helped in getting the fit right. At this point, the my drop-bar 970 fits very close to my road bikes in terms of reach. Stack is a bit taller..by design.

**I rode the flat OEM bar version of my 970 for 20 miles after I first got it.."folded in half"...like a 4-5 inch drop Yikes. OK-ish for one short ride, but I wouldn't make a habit of it..certainly not touring.
fishboat is offline