Originally Posted by
sarhog
What person? I was answering the question about a cop mailing you a ticket. There was no person mentioned in that scenario.
Last time I checked, the cop was a person. Someone watched that video and determined it shows a violation. That person would testify as to the origin of the video and its authenticity, and to what is observed on the video. The video would then be entered as an exhibit. The judge would then view the video.
Are you under the impression that you can't prosecute a burglar if they're identified only by security cam evidence? It's exactly the same thing.
I've taught con law. You're not even in the neighborhood of a confrontation clause violation.