View Single Post
Old 08-05-19, 10:40 AM
  #10  
Rstyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by LesG
Proscar is something not mentioned for benign prostate enlargement. 10 years ago or so there was some controversy about it in the medical community about taking it and prostate cancer. The problem, according to my "read" is that it didn't/doesn't cause cancer but hides it and hides a particularly aggressive type. Mainly it hides it by giving you a low PSA reading. A more recent study (last year or two) indicated proscar wasn't any worse or better with regards to prostate cancer. A couple of other downsides is that it takes up to 6 months to work. Also if you're a blood donor, you need to stop taking it 30 days ahead of time. The main upside is that it actually helps to shrink the prostate and a side bonus is possible regrowth of hair.

The above said, I've been taking it for several months. I've noticed no side affects. The "flow" is significantly better but it took about 3 to 4 months to get there. Supposedly if I stop taking it the benefits could last up to around a year. Since, what I've read says (mentioned above), if you donate blood you need to stop taking it 30 days ahead of time. Combine that with it possibly giving you a false low PSA while taking it, I'm going to stop taking it 30 days before my next checkup around October. I have to discuss that with my Dr. but my reasoning (right or wrong) is if I stop taking it 30 days ahead of time, based upon being able to donate blood after that, then it would be out of my system and I'd get a true or at least truer PSA reading. That is conjecture on my part and, again, something I need to talk with the Dr. about when the time comes. My PSA has always been low to start with.
Well....concerned about side effect of impotence with .proscar and retrograde ejaculation with Flomax.......but when you have to pee, you have to pee.........and neither one affects cycling.

I have hopes for prostate embolization. Very promising studies but not enough time to determine long term effect. Theoretically, ( my opinion), in addition to destroying large parts of the gland, shrinking it and relieving BPH, you would think that decreasing the volume of prostatic tissue you would decrease the chances of an individual developing cancer
Rstyle is offline