Originally Posted by
arod
I'm currently looking for a new XC mountain bike (around the entry 'race' level range) and trying to decide whether I want to go carbon or aluminium.
I know there are many factors to consider, but all things being equal, is a carbon frame always going to be superior (particularly stiffer) to an aluminium frame? In what circumstances (if any) is an aluminium frame better than a carbon frame?
Appreciate hearing people's thoughts and experiences.
IMO, until you get to the higher level price points, the extra $ you spend to get a CF frame is almost always better spent on something else on the bike.
I really din’t consider whether a bike is Al or CF. I look for the suspension design, fit, and geo first, then (if looking at a complete bike) what has the components I want. If The bike ends up being CF that is fine, but I would not let that be a driving consideration.
EDIT: the above is for FS bikes. For a HT I think CF can be a distinct benefit over Al.... though I always end up with steel.