View Single Post
Old 07-08-19, 12:38 PM
  #69  
jamesdak 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,675

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2324 Post(s)
Liked 4,992 Times in 1,777 Posts
Originally Posted by Last ride 76
I'm sorry, are you claiming IDENTICAL test conditions except for frame a that weighs 1 1/2 lbs more & built of different shaped tubes, with a wheelset that is heavier by a lb, and less aerodynamically efficient? And you attribute the 1.1 mph increase to different power transmission characteristics of the frames? Or are you saying that aerodynamic improvement in the frame alone, (not in your position on the bike) accounts for the difference? If you changed your position, absolutely, sure (LeMond/Fignon). Just the frame's power transmission and it's incremental aero improvement? Seems like there's a piece missing.
To put it simply, weight is only part of the equation.

Now the faster bike is red, white and blue and we know red makes a bike faster so yeah that's why!
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is offline