Originally Posted by
jomonds
I own a 2010 Trek 7.7FX that comes with 105 group of components. Yes, the 7.7FX is not as expensive (costs about 2/3 than that of the Diem), its just a bit heavier (I think a little more than kilo than the Diem), and not as fragile (i.e. I'm afraid of hanging the Orbea on a bike rack for fear that it may crack). And to be very honest, a fitness/recreational rider like me can't tell any big difference in the ride quality and speed between the two bikes!
But there is something (subjective) about the Orbea that makes it more enjoyable to ride. I also somehow get more enjoyment in cleaning and taking care of it. It does not shout for attention but yet attracts a lot of positive comments with the other bikers, and I could not agree more. IMHO, getting a bike with an aluminum frame will not get you something almost exactly or as close to the Orbea.
Carying a full bottle of water makes a bigger difference in weight so you indeed will not feel the difference.
If anyone wants to spend thousands of dollars on a pro bike to -as you describe it- "attract a lot of positive comments with the other bikers", than that is ofcourse their good right ... but then it is also my good right to disregard that sort of infantile behaviour as "silly".