View Single Post
Old 09-25-19, 07:58 PM
  #155  
ljsense
Senior Member
 
ljsense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Madison, Wis.
Posts: 754
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 152 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeKahno
The actual degree of risk is irrelevant.

If, while jogging down a pubic trail I elevate the intensity of my workout by shadow boxing a series of imaginary opponents, maybe even using small weights, other trail users are going to perceive that as putting them at risk. It doesn't matter if I've never hit anybody. It doesn't matter if others engage in the same behavior without hitting anybody. The perception is there.

If I can increase everyone's enjoyment of public space by forgoing behavior many would perceive as placing them at risk, that's the way I'll go. I can change my behavior, all I can do is complain about their perception.
It would increase my enjoyment of this forum if I didn't have to risk reading this tortuously bad logic.

You're favoring ignorant people. A few people ought to learn that some people are in total control of their bike without their hands. But instead of confronting this stupidity, you say they're entitled to it, and others should adjust to make them more comfortable with their ignorance.
ljsense is offline  
Likes For ljsense: