Originally Posted by
Abe_Froman
No doubt. But you're talking about fault on the part of the consumer. Compass was trying to absolve themselves of fauly due to their OWN actions.
I mean this is obviously an extreme example, but if a tire spontaneously explodes and incinerates half the people on a group ride, Compass is responsible for a whole lot more than a replacement tire.
Maybe. Won't know for sure until the trial is over. My bet is that a warranty refusal to cover consequential damages like a chewed up rim is valid and Compass has no legal obligation in that regard.