Old 03-28-20, 03:01 PM
  #29  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Yeah, literally EVERYONE else uses power data if it's available. I don't know what Wahoo's thinking is, but it's ridiculous.

This morning was 21 miles, 600kj, average HR 105 (47% intensity,) and Wahoo gave me 280kcal.
Thursday was 20 miles, 740kj, average HR 128 (66% intensity) and Wahoo figured 813kcal, which is almost exactly kJ x 1.1, which is what Garmin, etc all use.
Tuesday was 28 miles, 977kj, average HR 135 (68% intensity) and Wahoo figured 1,232kcal, which might as well be a made up number.

So apparently, If I ride with an average HR 125-130bpm, Wahoo will get at the least reasonably close. But drop below 120 or go above 130 and might as well just guess. Efforts above 70% are like 800-900kcal per hour.

Now I do have power, so I know what's what-- but I'm also a slave to the damn Activity Rings on my Apple Watch, and end up doing a lot to close them when Wahoo is giving me half on calorie burn.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline