View Single Post
Old 10-14-20, 12:16 PM
  #25  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by HerrKaLeun
700c, 28" and 29" are exactly the same size, just different names. They have been on the market forever.... I remember the 28" from the 1980s, Maybe not on an MTB-designated bike, but on what one would have said back then " normal bike", maybe labelled as hybrid these days. the MTB from the old days had the same geometry as " normal bikes" anyway.

Vintage is just a nice word for outdated.
If you want to advance a hypothesis you need to use more precise language. I don't think anyone ever marketed a "normal" bike. What are you talking about?

FWIW, these are 28x2.0 tires. I don't think anyone would confuse them with 29r mtb design





Equally, early era MTB/ATB's could not be confused in any way with modern "hybrid design. This is a 1984 Norco that shows such initial geometry (the first commercial MTB was in 82). Yes, it's got mis-matchy parts, I just picked it up off CL.


Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-14-20 at 12:24 PM.
Happy Feet is offline