View Single Post
Old 03-02-21, 11:07 AM
  #8  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,203

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3459 Post(s)
Liked 1,465 Times in 1,143 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Yeah, looks like I am piling on here- a 20t jump is massive and drivetrains arent designed for that. ....
My two derailleur touring bikes are half step plus granny, 46/42/24. If I got rid of the big ring, I would have a double with 42 and 24, an 18 tooth jump. And that shifts just fine.

I am using older derailleurs for a double, thus on the upshift off of the 24 I have to overshift and back off a hair, but that could probably be fixed if I had a derailleur that was designed for that instead of using a vintage one that does not lift the chain. I anticipated dropping chains, so I put a chain catcher on initially, thus I do not really know if I would have dropped chains or not, have not tried it without a chain catcher.





I do not think it would be any different if I had a 20 tooth difference instead of 18.

If I did get rid of the big ring, my derailleur would be closer to the granny sprocket, that would improve shifting from what I have.

ADDENDUM:

I should have noted that on these derailleur bikes, I use bar end shifters, Shimano BS-64, front is friction. For my odd mix of chainring sizes and derailleur choices, I am most certain that an indexed shifter would not work.

Last edited by Tourist in MSN; 03-02-21 at 12:55 PM.
Tourist in MSN is offline