View Single Post
Old 09-16-19, 04:30 PM
  #9  
fraba
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 196

Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Super Course - 1981 Velo Sport Criterium - c.1988 Colnago Master Piu - 1991 Merlin Road - 1991 Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra - 1995 Pinarello Cromovan - c.1999 Lemond Maillot Jaune Team Saturn - 2002 Colnago C-40 - Also modern stuff

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by burnthesheep
I went 175 to 165. It's actually the difference, times two. The way I see it.

You gain 10mm in aero by raising the saddle for the 10mm less at BDC. Then you gain 10mm towards hip angle at TDC.

I may be wrong on that, but feels that way to me!
Not sure I understand the "times two" . If you gain 10mm in aero, it means you did not raise your stem so your hip angle is more pronounced than it was at BDC. But because your crank arm is 10mm shorter, hip angle at TDC is probably similar than what it was with the 175 crank. To me the real advantage is that you can decide what to do with the 10mm (aero, hip or split between the two).
fraba is offline