View Single Post
Old 06-30-20, 12:25 PM
  #93  
surak
Senior Member
 
surak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times in 436 Posts
Originally Posted by colnago62
I think Coggen in his book talks about using a riders best 20 minute average during a ride to determine ftp. The most important thing is to use the same system consistently. Eventually a rider will figure out what they have to do to get their best numbers.
​​​​​​It's arbitrary because without a semblance of a protocol, Garmin misses many confounding factors like the fact that I wasn't riding to exhaustion. Those 20 minutes were during a climb that happened to take me about that long, but with 2 more hours of riding ahead. Another indication of its arbitrariness: none of my outdoor rides are what I would consider useful for estimating FTP, and Garmin only ever managed to find that one ride to produce an estimate.
surak is offline  
Likes For surak: