Old 06-08-10, 12:09 AM
  #10  
1nterceptor
LET'S ROLL
 
1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NEW YORK, NY - USA
Posts: 4,782

Bikes: 2014 BMC Gran Fondo, 2013 Brompton S6L-X

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 306 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 33 Posts
CyciumX, what camera are you using? My equipment is what people would call, doo-doo.
And I would like to upgrade in the future.

Originally Posted by CyciumX

Now that is 720p, but its been compressed twice. Once in the intial editing and to downsize the filesize for uploading and then once uploaded, but it will give you a good clue as to how much detail is lost from the smaller standard res cam.




Those are screen grabs from the original uncompressed video.

To answer your question - yes you can see more accumulated data from a moving picture, but in this case of 720p it would help, but in a lower res... there still would not be sufficient data to read a plate. No matter how hard you tried. I only run 720p for the 60 fps aspect... I could easily run 1080p and from my early diagram posted... its easy to see how much more surface area there is PLUS - and this is important. The 1080p option has less of a viewing angle. That means whatever is on screen isn't sharing space with a larger viewing area. Basically means even more detail than just upping the screen size.
1nterceptor is offline