Originally Posted by
njkayaker
"Guilt" is a product of a court trial. This forum isn't a court.
There is evidence. You keep ignoring it.
You are ignoring a lot more stuff.
The driver got into an altercation with the "crazed cyclist". Then, drove in the same direction as the "crazed cyclist". Then, managed to get into a second altercation with the same exact "crazed cyclist". Then, the driver left going in the completely opposite direction. That's a lot of coincidences stacked up!
If you would be so oblivious to the possibility of a cyclist riding in front of you when just minutes before the same thing happened on the same path and the same direction, you should probably stop driving,
This (more or less) happened twice. A few minutes apart on the same path with the same cyclist going the same direction!
Some of the people here seem to be going out of their way to ignore the premeditation that is so obvious here. They'd rather believe the astronomical odds of meeting the same person on the same path at the same type of intersection just moments after he was scolded for poor driving is a coincidence.
He managed to wait and avoid
everyone else on the path but somehow only hit the very same guy that he encountered just moments before? Really people? Really? This is why the legal concept of a "jury of your peers" terrifies me.