Old 12-10-20, 01:07 PM
  #88  
Bike Gremlin
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Don't exclude the opposite situation, where a chain may show .25% elongation, even after 6000 miles of use, but the roller and side clearance wear is overly large. The roller wear at that point can still cause new-chain skip. A Campy chain can do this, which is probably why they suggest using calipers between the outer plates to a maximum length of 132.6mm, rather than measuring elongation alone. Over that short length most of the wear is roller wear.

I started monitoring the elongation on sram axs chains that I had in use that also seemed to elongate very little, but now I've got two bikes that need 55 inch chains, so my previous 54 inch chains can't be used and I'm starting over. I will not be using only one chain on each bike. I much prefer using several chains in a rotation.

I've read reports of axs users with 6000 miles on a chain that still checks OK, but those users don't monitor side clearance or roller wear. Most likely, their second axs chain will skip and their $350 cassette will have a very short life. I've also read of outer plates cracking after 3000 miles.

https://weightweenies.starbike.com/f...2596&mode=view
I did an experiment to see (confirm) if roller wear affects chain engagement. It doesn't. Even when taking the rollers completely out, the chain engages cassette properly. Only once there is pin wear (i.e. chain elongation) does a chain start to ride higher on cassette teeth, not engaging properly.

As for the wear "location" - elongation occurs between two pairs of outer plates, while pins on the same outer plate will stay at the same distance regardless of the chain wear, of course.
Bike Gremlin is offline