Originally Posted by
Da Reef
Yep, over by 3", 65" vs 62". Given the odd size of the bag I tried to explain that measuring from the longest/tallest/widest point to point wasn't really fair. She wasn't having it.
yep...it's definitely over the limit when properly measured.
they like to sell the unusual dimensions as a positive -- that it is easy to mis-measure (and therefore under-measure).
technically the agent was right. IME, it is rare to even get questioned about it, much less measured. if it happens 5% of the time, you still come out ahead.
it just LOOKS so much smaller than any other bike bag. that makes it easy for people to believe it's not a bike.