Old 02-01-19, 07:51 PM
  #6  
Spoonrobot 
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,063
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1216 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times in 116 Posts
Originally Posted by radroad
What's amazing is that this 78% increase YOY came even with a 25% tariff imposed on the entire industry! Imagine what sales would look like without the tariff!
E-bike market is interesting. It's getting misrepresented in various ways, your post is a great example, and is fascinating to watch. The protectionism Europe is undertaking against Chinese e-bike dumping has been much more accepted by Americans than tariffs in the US on the same. Not unexpected as much of the political divide is fueled by a vocal low-information minority seeking to influence others.

https://www.bicycleretailer.com/inte...hinese-e-bikes

A 13-month EU investigation concluded that Chinese e-bike manufacturers benefit from unfair state subsidies including preferential financing, the ability to buy motors and batteries from other Chinese suppliers such as Bafang at below-market prices, tax breaks, government grants and cheap access to land.
Duties vary for several specified manufacturers. Giant Electric Vehicle, a division of Taiwan's Giant Bicycles based in Kunshan, China, was assessed a duty of 24.6 percent. Duties for other companies include 73.4 percent for Bodo Vehicle Group; 18.8 percent for Jinhua Vision Industry; and 48.1 percent for Yada Technology Group.

Duties for several other Chinese e-bike manufacturers were set at 33.4 percent, but some will be required to pay 79.3 percent.

The EU said the influx of low-priced Chinese e-bikes has kept European producers from reaping the full benefits of Europe's booming e-bike market.
I think tariffs on e-bikes and e-bike accessories should be significantly higher. Luxury goods that are booming in popularity are an excellent tariff-bearer and can benefit other industries such as non-motorized bicycles.
Spoonrobot is offline