View Single Post
Old 12-30-19, 10:23 AM
  #111  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
I think it is clear, average cyclist cadence up a hill is lower than on the flat.
Recent posts that is due to gears is not the reason IMO.
I think when folks have lower gears, they will still choose a lower cadence up a hill.

I think given the choice the average rider would raise the seat up a hill too - and pedal a lower cadence.

So my question is - who thinks it should be the same - and why?
I'd point out that maybe flat cadence is encouraged to be higher than needed for max efficiency.
Doge is offline