View Single Post
Old 06-14-20, 07:31 AM
  #7  
StarBiker
Senior Member
 
StarBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,023

Bikes: Bianchi Grizzly, Cannondale F700,

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 807 Post(s)
Liked 154 Times in 123 Posts
Originally Posted by yamsyamsyams
If solely judging by the dollars spent on walking vs bike equipment, regardless of distance, bike would be more costly. A pair of cheapo $20 Walmart shoes could cover my 16 mile (one way) commute, compared to a $200 Walmart bike.

Again this only works if you take dollars spent on equipment as the only variable. Once you factor in time cost, then bike wins in my scenario. But if you are 2 blocks from your work, then obviously shoes would win out on cost!
You must have some quite sturdy feet, and hips. When was the last time you walked 15 miles in cheap shoes......?
StarBiker is offline  
Likes For StarBiker: