Old 03-30-20, 12:05 PM
  #42  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,532

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
I think the comparison isn't PM alone vs. PM + HRM. I think the comparison is RPE + PM vs RPE + PM + HRM since you always have RPE. I'm sorta surprised that many riders seem to think they no longer have to think about RPE.

It's as if they asked themselves the question, "Now that you have HR, are you still checking RPE?" and they answered "No."
Good point. Having a PM for the last 9 months has really helped me to develop a finer sense of RPE. Our tandem doesn't have power, just HR, but now I can do a decent job of estimating my power output from pedal feel. That enables me to do a better job of guessing at time to exhaustion than just watching HR, which is sometimes depressed if I've been training hard on my single. More data is better.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is online now