View Single Post
Old 11-20-19, 09:48 AM
  #40  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times in 253 Posts
Originally Posted by L134
There is a parallel universe. In this parallel universe, bicycle derailleur systems were originally a primitive, complicated, indexed shifting system. Triples shifted poorly so were dropped. Chainrings required pins and ramps to shift and had to be matched to each other. Outer chainrings required a pin on the outside to catch chain over-shifts. The inner plates of front derailleurs needed to be sculpted and matched to the matched chainrings in order to shift properly or at all. Eventually, 2x drive systems were dropped. Customization of the drive train was limited. Derailleur instruction manuals were pages and pages long and youtube was full of videos on how to make them work. The bike forums were over-run with endless questions regarding the compatibility of various parts and discussions regarding proper set-up and adjustment. “Didn’t you read page 39 of the instructions?” But in time, the bicycle evolved and friction shifting was developed to solve the many shortcomings of indexed drive systems. Issues of compatibility all but disappeared, 3x drive systems became popular and shifted well, pins and ramps and sculpted derailleur cages were eliminated, chain rings became available in almost any tooth count allowing one to customize one’s drive system in endless ways. Instruction “manuals” became a single page. Life became simple and good.
In my job job I've designed things I thought would be easy for users that users found not so easy. Of course an investment in more user training, or new designs can be a solution, but generally the more economical one is to remove the feature and simplify.

I believe a triple can be made to work very smoothly. I do not believe it can be as smooth as the best doubles with orientation, one shift direction (small ring chain always goes right), ramps and money that went into making them so good. The Dura-Ace rings have about 15 parts in them and a lot of R&D. But in the end, if a market does not have the skill to adjust derailleurs like @jamesdak , the market may choose the simpler option, over investing in a new skill. That and it is lighter and stiffer, and reduced Q factor (I don't care, but some do) not to have a triple.
Doge is offline