View Single Post
Old 07-08-19, 11:10 AM
  #17  
burnthesheep
Newbie racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406

Bikes: Propel, red is faster

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times in 974 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Having watched my HR for a couple decades, I think having both power and HR is a very good thing. One works with power zones to increase one's ability to hold power for longer periods and more power for shorter periods. Power doesn't report on your physiology, unless you can call no longer being able to turn the pedals a report. HR reports your physiologic zones. If you keep holding power as your HR rises and rises, pretty soon you can't hold the power. Rising HR is the advance notice of that. Pushing power while your HR has risen out of the zone in which you're trying to perform is counterproductive. You're not stressing what you're trying to stress. Note that is not true of the athlete you're trying to emulate.

I think 2 ea. 24" box fans would be your immediate next step, very inexpensive and effective. It's possible they won't make any difference, but you want to know that before trying anything else. I doubt you're dehydrating during these short workouts, but you could be overheating. Bare torso, right?

Next thing would be to forget about this time-crunched cyclist type of thing and do an endurance block. For the next couple of weeks, put in as much time in zone 2 as you can recover from, preferably 2 or so hour rides outside. You could simply be lacking in endurance. A good goal for decent performance would be ~400 hours/year. Ed Burke said that trying to do high end work without an adequate aerobic base was not productive. IME there's something to that. I start training for the next summer in October and don't start doing hard intervals until February.

Another useful thing would be to get a premium TrainingPeaks account and log all your workouts there. It takes some time to figure out how to interpret the Performance Manager Chart (PMC). I've found being able to chart my body's readiness to train has made a big difference. No canned workout schedule or online training plan is really usable without being able to interpret its effect on your body in real time.
This was a good post except for the above bolded part. Just IMO people are different with different goals, so prescribing a specific "base" amount of time isn't really helpful.

As it stands, it looks like I'll hit 320w for 20min this year and still never in my life have cracked more than 250hrs a year. I dare say that for 2020, I think I can get it to 340w for 20min on under 300 hrs per year.

Yes, sometimes you do need to go long. But a lot of endurance athlete hobbyists are frankly ******* when it comes to the tougher intervals and hide behind low intensity "volume". You know, the A-group rider who does 10k miles per year but couldn't do a 3x3min workout if you put a gun to their head.

Would I be faster still if I ramped my CTL up to some crazy value like 80? Probably. Am I pretty darn fast for spending half the time other people do? Yeah. Fast is relative, always faster folks out there. Maybe I'm a freak, I dunno.
burnthesheep is offline  
Likes For burnthesheep: