Originally Posted by
GreenAnvil
That is a valid point, however, sticking to the evidence provided by the police officer (the videos) the evidence is inadmissible since it does not prove that a sign was actually posted on the side of the intersection the cyclists were coming from. A defense attorney could well argue someone removed the sign, or that even the cops removed it for their “run the sign trap”.
Point is the videos prove nothing, just that the cop told a couple of kids on bikes to stop.
Knock yourself out - I'm not looking to Perry Mason the case, just looking at it from the most likely scenario.