View Single Post
Old 12-20-20, 01:01 PM
  #67  
mr_pedro
Senior Member
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
The original point of FTP was that it was a relatively simple measurement to make in the field. It was never a lab based metabolic measurement. I don't think there has ever been a definition of FTP that would support riding at 105% for an hour. People that ride over 100% for an hour simply have their FTP set too low which is not uncommon as FTP is not constant over time.
I think the point that was being made is that the 1 hour point is not in the definition and some genetic freak might be able to do it. But I agree it is very unlikely because if FTP>1hr, then the part between 1hr and FTP TTE is not that steep.

This article explains how you could define FTP:https://www.trainingpeaks.com/blog/t...ing-protocols/

It is the point on the power curve when power suddenly starts to drop much faster, after it drops slowly from say 20min onwards.
mr_pedro is offline  
Likes For mr_pedro: