View Single Post
Old 12-20-20, 01:17 PM
  #68  
DaveLeeNC
Senior Member
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
The original point of FTP was that it was a relatively simple measurement to make in the field. It was never a lab based metabolic measurement. I don't think there has ever been a definition of FTP that would support riding at 105% for an hour. People that ride over 100% for an hour simply have their FTP set too low which is not uncommon as FTP is not constant over time.
I believe that it was originally a lab based thing (the point at which you start to accumulate significant bloodstream lactate). The field measurements are a way to do this determination in the field without a lab. I have no idea how different they might be in some cases. And I agree that 5% more power (as opposed to 5% longer) is a big step. dave
DaveLeeNC is offline